A Question of Rights
Catholics Have a Right to a Renewed Church
By James E. Biechler
"You folks in ARCC are always
whining about problems in the church. The Second Vatican Council has done
its work of church reform. Can’t you just be satisfied and give the rest
of us some respite from your complaints? If you can’t be satisfied why
not go to an institution that suits you?"
--H.M.Y., Onamia, MN
So, you are suggesting that
ARCC fits right in with the rest of this "nation of whiners!" We prefer
to think of ourselves as fitting right in with the historical "Jesus movement"
which was characterized from the beginning as a "protest" movement. Jesus
himself was a reformer who was unsatisfied with the Jewish culture of his
day, even though all Jews saw that culture as based upon the word of God
and governed by the Torah. Jesus did not accept the divinely legitimated
priestly establishment as the last word in the service of God.
The movement which Jesus
began has a divine discontent at its heart. "Satisfaction" is a word not
in the Christian vocabulary. We remember the saying of Jesus: "After you
have done all these things, say 'We are unprofitable servants [Lk 17:10].'"
When we pray "thy kingdom come" we are acknowledging that there is much
work yet to be done. The "kingdom" is unfinished business.
You are correct to point
to the reform activities of the Second Vatican Council. But reform does
not happen in the Vatican. Even superficial evaluations of Vatican II make
it clear that the church is still far from being what the council envisioned.
Granted, some wonderful improvements have been made. But even these have
revealed many additional areas and problems which need attention. ARCC
is one small voice pointing out specific shortcomings in our church’s practice
of justice.
Perhaps more Catholics would
join us in our mission if they had anything but the most elementary grasp
of Vatican II’s vision for the church. When the work of the council was
taken home for implementation the task before us was monumental. As implementation
proceeded, many Catholics, priests and bishops included, lacked the theological
and historical education to understand the changes and the real need for
them. That education is still a desideratum.
For one thing—and of special
importance to ARCC—Vatican II put a new emphasis on the fundamental equality
of all the baptized. This New Testament doctrine seemed to clash with the
understanding of many bishops and lay people that the church was a divinely
established "monarchy," with pope and bishops as rulers. The historical
truth is that the early "Jesus movement" was communal and democratic. Unaware
of this history, many Catholics found themselves threatened: priests and
bishops thought their authority was being weakened, and lay people felt
uneasy seeing their friends and neighbors in the sanctuary.
ARCC is not the problem.
Our activities are necessary (unfortunately!) in order to point out areas
in which church order and gospel ideals are in conflict—sometimes at the
highest levels. Just consider the recent heavy artillery the Vatican has
rolled out against lay people engaged in liturgical and governance roles.
Even bishops were aghast at the Vatican action and there is a scurrying
about now to kill, by means of a thousand qualifications, the so-called
"Instruction on Certain Questions Regarding the Collaboration of the Non-Ordained
Faithful in the Sacred Ministry of the Priest." The English hierarchy assures
us that England and Wales were not meant. Bishop Stecher of Innsbruck blasted
the Vatican leadership for sacrificing everything "to a definition of church
office for which there is no basis in revelation." Recently Cardinal Roger
Mahony of Los Angeles was attacked by Mother Angelica for his work on liturgical
reform. Vatican II’s enemies are very active.
ARCC believes that Catholics
have a strict right in justice to a reformed church, to a church in which
all of the baptized enjoy a true equality (Canon 208). We also hold that
Catholics should be able to "vindicate and defend the rights which they
enjoy in the Church before a competent ecclesiastical court" (Canon 221,
§1). As any educated Catholic knows, fifteen years after this canon
became the law of the church, it is still not possible to vindicate these
rights because diocesan tribunals are all but exclusively limited to processing
marriage annulments. The result is that most of our so-called "rights"
are still fictions.
Scripture shows us a picture
of Jesus bringing a message of compassion and equality to a social world
of exclusivity and juridical purity. The "kingdom of God" he preached was
to be a society of open commensality where the justice of God was lavish
and openhanded. No one in the world today thinks of the Catholic Church
as practicing lavish and openhanded justice. ARCC believes that Catholics
have a claim in justice to a church which corresponds to New Testament
teaching.
Dr. Biechler, an emeritus
professor of religion, is a member of ARCC's board of directors. He also
holds a licentiate in canon law and is a longtime member of the Canon Law
Society of America.
E-mail
Comments to Dr. Biechler |