A Question of Rights
Catholic Hierarchy Fails Catholic Workers
By James E. Biechler
I don't understand why ARCC's
"Charter of Rights" has to include No. 23 about the right of employees
to decent working conditions, wages and job security. The church has been
in the forefront of the labor movement, and canon law itself is clear on
this right. Why your pious posturing about defending the rights of workers?
In this you are just riding the coattails of some great bishops and popes.
--WLB, Franklin, TN
Yes, you're right. We are
riding on the coattails of some great bishops and popes. But as we look
around we can't seem to find many bishops and priests with us on those
coattails. ARCC is actually trying to do something to defend the rights
of workers-þespecially those in Catholic institutions because we
really cannot do much about othersþ-but we, and others in the same
ministry, are opposed by Catholic authorities at every turn.
And yes, again. We do hear
bishops repeating the call for justice in society and we are not ungrateful
for that voice. We have no lack of beautiful rhetoric on social issues
and justice for workers. This is the tenth anniversary of the famous pastoral
letter "Economic Justice for All," issued by the American bishops on November
27, 1986. This is a comprehensive, broad-based and thoroughly researched
presentation of the church's position on the economic aspects of American
society. Gospel ideals and the church's modern explication of those ideals
could hardly find a better American expression.
The letter is particularly
eloquent on the responsibility of the church itself: "All the principles
that govern the just operation of any economic endeavor apply to the church
and its agencies and institutions; indeed the church should be exemplary."
It then repeats the admonition of the 1971 Synod of Bishops: "While the
church is bound to give witness to justice, she recognizes that anyone
who ventures to speak to people about justice must first be just in their
eyes. Hence we must undertake an examination of the modes of acting and
of the possessions and lifestyle found within the church herself."
We are not here concerned
to recount those areas in which the church and its institutions have actually
embodied its own ideals of justice. It is the glaring and scandalous failures
of the American church in the area of labor relations which continue to
pain Catholic workers and their supporters.
The March issue of U.S. Catholic
has an editorial column, "The Examined Life," which urged readers "Let's
practice what the bishops preach." "The demise of labor unions in the United
States is a sad chapter in the story of dwindling adherence to the social
teachings of the popes and bishops," the columnist, Robert. E. Burns, stated.
The column had nothing to say about the labor movement as it found application
among those employed by Catholic institutions. Had that aspect of life
been examined, part of the mystery of the demise of labor unions might
have been clarified. Our political leaders, the column states, "are counting
on the indifference of Catholics and others to the unequivocal teachings
of our religious leaders that, above all else, we respect the dignity of
all human persons." The problem is not "the unequivocal teachings" of our
religious leaders; it is their behavior toward their own.
From your perspective in
Franklin, Tennessee, what does the record of the American hierarchy look
like in respect to its own practice of the church's social teachings? Have
you heard of the Supreme Court case National Labor Relations Board vs.
The Catholic Bishop of Chicago (1979)? Guess why the NLRB was "versus"
the "Catholic Bishop of Chicago"? Why did the Pennsylvania Labor Relations
Board cite the late John Cardinal Krol for unfair labor practices (1972)?
Multiply these questions by 50 and you still would not finish the list
of cases in which the Catholic establishment fought its own employeesþnurses,
teachers, professorsþwho were trying to do just what the popes and
bishops taught them was right and honorable for them to do. Is it any wonder
that managers and other executives in the world of business and industry
should feel no moral compunction in opposing workers' organizations when
the public record of Catholic church officials in dealing with its own
employees was itself so often anti-labor?
On the positive side we have
this recent remark from ARCC's Vatican2 Internet listserver, February 1,1996:
"Thank God for shepherds like Hunthausen, Weakland, et al., who over the
years have called on their fellow bishops to start taking account of their
role as employers and to practice what they preach."
We agree with U.S. Catholic
that the labor movement is under attack. AFL-CIO President John Sweeney
told Catholic social justice leaders on February 27 that there is "an all-out
assault" on worker protection and that workers themselves "are disgusted
with business, government...and even the church." How could workers be
disgusted with the church if it practiced what it preaches about labor
relations?
ARCC's position is not "pious
posturing" as you call it. There is a clear need in this area and we are
convinced that the church could become a powerful force in advancing the
cause of workers (and of God's justice) if it walked its own talk.
Dr. Biechler, an emeritus
professor of religion, is a member of ARCC's board of directors. He also
holds a licentiate in canon law and is a longtime member of the Canon Law
Society of America.
E-mail
Comments to Dr. Biechler |